4DOF by gigifux

Yes I'm agree with Pit sabertooth is the first choice and probably the only good choice for these motors. Jrk are the best for me, but only in their range of operation. Asking to these card to control big motors
imposes limits and creates problems in addition to the continuous risk of burn

Yes the motor are really strong. the problem is that might be also too fast with a 18cm lever

springs for save gearbox of traction loss

Those springs are going to introduce more problems then what they are worth - especially once you put a load on there. The ideal slack/play in a sims drive train is zero - Its one of the reasons I picked ballscrews.

Haven't seen a sim that was 'too' fast. Lets see if the motors are 'too' fast once you get a load/passenger at full noise on there. Inertia is an equaliser .

Really I don't like very much my solution. My motors are 90zyt with ratio 60:1 anda have 80rpm. For traction loss and surge I'm obliged to use 18cm levers if I vant 15cm left, 15cm right for tl and 15cm forward,15cm backward for surge. I fear that forward/backword or left/right very fast might broken the gearbox. Can you pelase show me your solution using ballscrews?

Hi
I post here my last two thread ragarding some problems that I'm not able to fix
A few years ago I made a 2dof simulator with zyt73 motors and jrk 12v12 cards.
This new project includes zyt90 motors and sabartooth 2x32 cards. With this kind of configuration I am a newbie and I need your support.
I post here my last two thread ragarding some problems that I'm not able to fix
Thank you
https://www.xsimulator.net/community/threads/sabertooth-2x32-battery-in-parallel.10564/
https://www.xsimulator.net/community/threads/simtools-not-work.10577/

Hallo everyone,
Here is the first gaming test last night.
Since the parameters have yet to be set, the amplitude and speed of each movement must still be calibrated.
What I surely enjoy and leaves me satisfied is that despite how you see the structure is provisionally raised from the ground, resting on two water chambers and despite the exaggerated movements it remains stable and does not break down, a sign of a good balance of the ' together

Hi gigi, Congratulations on your 4dof simulator, I have a 2dof simulator with 2 gearmotors 24v and in the electric schematic.
I am using the arduino uno and 2 H bridges ibt2 43a and I want to make an up-grade for 4dof
Please, can you tell which ino code and which electric schematic you used in your 4dof simulator

Hi gigi, (before I comment; I just want to say I KNOW NOTHING) However I'm a little confused; You say these motors are strong!

It states the motor is rated to 0.4 Nm, I've been asking about motors rated @ 50Nm and above, and these motors the community has stated as "unsuitable".

Now I mean NO offense, I am just trying to understand the process of choice, can someone fill me in!

Regards Jerry.

Hi Jerry,
First of all sorry if I answer more than 2 mounths later your question.
When for these motor You read 0,4 Nm it's not refered at gearbox but at motor. You You want know teh torque at gearbox you must multiply the torque at motor x gearbox ratio. bigger ratio mean less velocity but bigger torque
The r90ZYT-155-12 motor is 12V and should have 23A rated. this mean 275W .
The motor should have +/-5100 rpm (not verified).But I verify +/- 80 rpm at gearbox so this should mean 4800 rpm at motor.
If you try this calcolator http://www.claredot.net/it/sez_Elettrotec/calcolo-parametri-motori.php
you can verify that the motor at 4800rpm have 0,547 Nm and at 80rpm (at gearbox) the torque is 32,826 Nm

hallo to everyone.
I would ask you this question.

As you know I use 4 motors 90ZYT-155-12 mcp4 60:1 motors 12Volt with 2 sabertooth 2x32 and arduino uno

I used the arduino code suggested from Wanegain https://www.xsimulator.net/communit...bertooth-using-simplified-serial-working.136/ in wich I change only the range of motor (I set Minpot = 256, MaxPot = 768)

The motors of sim are
-Motor 1 and motor 3 are for roll pitch heave surge and sway roll 25%, pich 25%, surge 25%, heave 20%, sway
20% total 125%
-Motor 2 is only for traction loss (extra1) and is set to 100% and boundary filter at 50%
- Motor 4 is only for surge, is set to 100% and boundary filter at 50%
Now I see that to have decent movement I need to set in tuning center of simtools the value very very low.
With the values I set and you see in the photo posted the simulator work fine but I'm asking is if such low values are limiting and make me loose some details. It's correct? do you think I should change some value of
P, I,D,?
I also tried to capture max/min in gaming, reset value, then driving and then save the value i obtain
but the resulting values are highter than those imposed manually. If I save and try to to use these high value the sim moves very little and very slowly.

Compliments Gigi you did a good job, I like it all, I see a little underdened the rods pushing the seat, with some more accurate tuning it will be really fun.

Hi Norbeast thanks for reply. But in my TC the value are very very low. My question is if such low values are limiting and make me loose some details?

Hello !, could you tell me where did you by a seat ?. Thanks.

Hi
http://www.mirco.hu/en/mirco-fia-seat/mirco-rs2-seat
Fantastic seat very confortable and available in many colors